Cloning

I think that there are not a lot of subject that started even a half of the debates and arguments for and against than cloning did. This relatively not new invention of modern day science is revolutionising our understanding of what is man capable of doing and how deeply can he interfere in phenomenon’s that only nature should be able to manipulate. So without further introduction lets begin this interesting topic of discussion.

Let us start by defining what coning really is. It is the process of making a cell product, or organism that is genetically identical to the unit or individual from which it was derived.  Sounds simple? Lets get to the more tricky part then. Even thou the procedure of cloning is getting more and more developed every day the opposition of this invention is also growing. Why is that? 

The answer to this question is more from the ethical perspective. From that point of view cloning is an unforgivable activate. Activity because of which the balance of nature is being interrupted. Man should not be able to manipulate with people genes mainly because of two reasons. Evolution has taken thousands of years to construct the gene packaging that we are now using. We newer said it was perfect, but it is stable and fairly well structuralized and whit little drawback. There is only a fairly small number of geneticall diseases in our population, but according to some experts this all will change if cloning will spread. One of the academy of cloning opposition leaders Mr Martin Grubs states that the use of genetically modified and cloned products is potentially dangerous to human health. He also proceeds by telling how immoral and unethical cloning really is. 

All in all, nevertheless cloning is not perfect. Mr Martin Grubs was right when clearly stating that, but I still think that it should not be completely rejected. It is possible that all these drawbacks will be dealt with and the phenomenon that could do harm to humankind will actually make it better.